Subscribe
Sign in
Home
Podcast
Patents
Artificial Intelligence
PatentRiff Daily Links
About
Patents
Latest
Top
Discussions
Federal Circuit Overturns $166M Finesse Verdict, Citing 'Confusing' Expert Testimony
A precedential opinion in Finesse v. AT&T
Sep 24
•
PatentRiff
New USPTO Director Squires Signals a Pro-Patent, Collaborative Era
"Our role is not to dispassionately say 'no'"
Sep 24
•
PatentRiff
Federal Circuit Clarifies "Prevailing Party" Status After Sanction-Based Dismissal
Future Link v. Realtek discusses post-dismissal attorney fees
Sep 11
•
PatentRiff
More Sonos: How a Two-Part Patent Figure Led to a $32.5M Reversal
A specification disagreement between N.D. Cal. and the CAFC
Sep 1
•
PatentRiff
USPTO Examiner Union Abolished Under National Security Mandate
A new E.O. says POPA must go
Aug 29
•
PatentRiff
Revisiting Judge Alsup's 2023 Post-Trial Criticism of Sonos's Continuation Practice
The CAFC win sinks the "submarine patent" characterization
Aug 29
•
PatentRiff
Federal Circuit Reinforces Patent Eligibility for Mechanical Inventions in PowerBlock v. iFit
In a precedential decision that may offer a sigh of relief to innovators in the mechanical and electromechanical arts, the U.S.
Aug 13
•
PatentRiff
Commerce Department Threatens Harvard’s Patents in Unprecedented Bayh-Dole Maneuver
In a move that has sent ripples through the technology transfer community, the U.S.
Aug 11
•
PatentRiff
Judge Michel Endorses RESTORE Act to Strengthen Patent Injunctions
The former Federal Circuit chief advocates for a return to pre-eBay injunctions
Jul 22
•
PatentRiff
Push vs. Pull: Federal Circuit Reverses $106M Verdict, Finding Estoppel from a Canceled Claim
The CAFC looks at the "public notice" function of prosecution history estoppel
Jul 21
•
PatentRiff
ICYMI: 'Patent Hour' from Late-May Discusses USPTO Inventory and Pendency
The Office has been fighting the 'backlog' even before the hiring unfreeze
Jul 17
•
PatentRiff
WaPo Reports USPTO Accelerating AI Integration into Patent Examination
Starting July 21, it will be “mandatory” for examiners to run an AI similarity check
Jul 16
•
PatentRiff
This site requires JavaScript to run correctly. Please
turn on JavaScript
or unblock scripts