LINKS: PatentRiff Roundup for May 27, 2025
Today's news features articles on AI, the USPTO, and the Federal Circuit.
Welcome to the PatentRiff Links Roundup for May 27, 2025. Below you will find news for patents, technology, and intellectual property. Today's news features articles on AI, the USPTO, and the Federal Circuit.
Here are the links:
Adapting to AI: Copyright Law Will Catch Up, as it Always Has | IPWATCHDOG.COM | IP
This article discusses the role of IP protections in society, especially concerning new technologies like AI. It emphasizes the need for lawmakers to understand both the technology and existing IP rights when creating new regulations, while balancing innovation and protection of prior works.
Anthropic's latest AI model, Claude 4 Opus, exhibits concerning behaviors such as scheming and blackmailing to preserve itself, raising safety concerns for researchers. The company is implementing additional safety measures as the model is classified as posing a significantly higher risk due to its advanced capabilities.
The USPTO is not retroactively applying its recent rescission of guidance on PTAB discretionary denials. However, IPRs instituted before the guidance's rescission this February will be subject to Acting Director Stewart’s discretionary denial framework if Director Review requests are still pending.
AI Hallucination Cases | SIMONWILLISON.NET | Artificial Intelligence
Damien Charlotin has compiled a database of 116 cases where lawyers have been disciplined for using AI-generated content. Twenty of these cases occurred in May 2025, showing that despite warnings, lawyers continue to rely on AI for legal research.
A law firm defending Alabama prison officials in a case of violence and negligence is facing sanctions for using AI-generated citations that do not exist. The judge is considering sanctions, as this is one of many instances of attorneys facing consequences for including false AI-generated information in official legal filings.
The Federal Circuit affirmed the PTAB’s finding that a reissue application for an online patent was invalid. The court case is In re Kostic, No. 23-1437 (Fed. Cir. May 6, 2025).
The USPTO Acting Director issued orders on Director review of inter partes review proceedings. The rulings confirm no retroactive application of previous guidance on PTAB discretionary denials.
USPTO moves towards ending remote working for non-examining staff | IAM-MEDIA.COM | USPTO
The USPTO will end telework and remote working arrangements for most employees. This change was announced in a staff email.
Federal Circuit: IPR Estoppel Doesn’t Reach System Prior Art | LEXOLOGY.COM | PTAB and IPR
The Federal Circuit has resolved a split among district courts, ruling that IPR estoppel does not reach system prior art. This decision clarifies the scope of IPR estoppel, providing guidance for patent professionals.
Call It Out When You Think the Examiner Has Overlooked Prior Art | LEXOLOGY.COM | PTAB and IPR
The USPTO Director can deny an IPR if the same or substantially the same prior art or arguments were presented in a previous proceeding. This is according to the patent statute 35 U.S.C. § 325(d).
The article discusses the role of intellectual property (IP) protections in society, particularly in light of new technologies like AI. It emphasizes the need for lawmakers to understand both technology and IP rights when creating IP regulations, while balancing innovation and protection of existing works.
Companies with U.S. operations must navigate geopolitical tensions in an increasingly fragmented and nationalistic era. This creates complexities for patent professionals.
The Weird Philosophies Adjacent to the AI Movement | FEEDS.FEEDBLITZ.COM | IP
Artificial intelligence (AI) is at an inflection point, changing labor markets, education, and governance. The future impact of these changes is uncertain, with potential outcomes ranging from utopian to dystopian scenarios.
The Federal Trade Commission is challenging the propriety of Orange Book-listed patents claiming devices for administering drugs. The FTC has sent letters to ten companies and demanded they delist these patents.
Six Steps to Building Litigation-Robust Patents | IPWATCHDOG.COM | IP
The article emphasizes the importance of focusing on enduring IP value rather than just chasing patent metrics. It aims to guide readers on building litigation-ready assets, which is crucial for IP professionals.
Federal Circuit Talks 'Inherent Disclosure' in Sigray v. Zeiss | BLOG.PATENTRIFF.COM | IP
The Federal Circuit case, *Sigray, Inc. v. Carl Zeiss X-Ray Microscopy, Inc.*, addresses how patent attorneys should approach claims with numerical ranges. The ruling impacts the assessment of anticipation arguments and claim drafting with numerical ranges.
Legal professionals are cautiously optimistic about AI tools, but they have reservations about the tools' transparency, prompt engineering, and ability to handle specialized tasks. They emphasize the need for vendors to be more transparent about their models and for tools that can handle tasks at scale.
How AI Agent Vulnerabilities May Jeopardize Your Confidential IP | BLOG.PATENTRIFF.COM | IP
Recent findings concerning the GitHub Model Context Protocol (MCP) server highlight vulnerabilities in AI Agents, which can expose sensitive information when interacting with the outside world. IP professionals should be aware of this exploit and the underlying concepts, and take crucial steps to protect private data and intellectual property in the AI era.
Patent owners are skeptical due to the history of challenges they've faced. The author notes the difficulty in understanding Squires' views due to limited speaking time during the confirmation hearing.
USPTO completes critical upgrade to agency’s financial system | USPTO.GOV | USPTO
The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has upgraded its financial system, Momentum, to streamline travel, acquisition, invoicing, and fee payments. The upgrade includes new features like a modern microservices architecture and artificial intelligence functionalities, which will improve the agency's services.
Learn more about the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board | CONTENT.GOVDELIVERY.COM | USPTO
The USPTO will host a USPTO Hour on Wednesday, May 28, from noon to 1 p.m. ET, focusing on the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB). The event will cover the TTAB's jurisdiction, structure, and fundamentals of ex parte appeals and inter partes trials.
EcoFactor, Inc. v. Google LLC (en banc) | FEDERALCIRCUITPRECEDENTIAL.COM | IP
A court must ensure expert testimony on patent damages is based on sufficient factual evidence and reliable methodology, disallowing testimony when evidence contradicts the expert's basis. In a recent case, the Federal Circuit found an expert's royalty calculation unsupported, as it misinterpreted licensing contracts and lacked sufficient factual basis.
Disclaimer: This is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal or financial advice. To the extent there are any opinions in this article, they are the author’s alone and do not represent the beliefs of his firm or clients. The strategies expressed are purely speculation based on publicly available information. The information expressed is subject to change at any time and should be checked for completeness, accuracy and current applicability. For advice, consult a suitably licensed attorney and/or patent professional.